• Complain

Miller - In the land of men: a memoir

Here you can read online Miller - In the land of men: a memoir full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: United States, year: 2020, publisher: Ecco;HarperCollins, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Miller In the land of men: a memoir
  • Book:
    In the land of men: a memoir
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Ecco;HarperCollins
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • City:
    United States
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

In the land of men: a memoir: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "In the land of men: a memoir" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A fiercely personal memoir about coming of age in the male-dominated literary world of the nineties, becoming the first female literary editor ofEsquire, and Millers personal and working relationship with David Foster Wallace
A naive and idealistic twenty-two-year-old from the Midwest, Adrienne Miller got her lucky break when she was hired as an editorial assistant atGQmagazine in the mid-nineties. Even if its sensibilities were manifestly mid-centurythe martinis, powerful male egos, and unquestioned authority of kingsGQstill seemed the red-hot center of the literary world. It was there that Miller began learning how to survive in a mans world. Three years later, she forged her own path, becoming the first woman to take on the role of literary editor ofEsquire, home to the male writers who had defined manhood itself Hemingway, Mailer, and Carver. Up against this old world, she would soon discover that it wanted nothing to do with a mere girl.
But this was also a unique moment in history that saw the rise of a new literary movement, as exemplified byMcSweeneys and the work of David Foster Wallace. A decade older than Miller, the mercurial Wallace would become the defining voice of a generation and the fiction writer she would work with most. He was her closest friend, confidantand antagonist. Their intellectual and artistic exchange grew into a highly charged professional and personal relationship between the most prominent male writer of the era and a young woman still finding her voice.
This memoira rich, dazzling story of power, ambition, and identityultimately asks the question How does a young woman fit into this male culture and at what cost? With great wit and deep intelligence, Miller presents an inspiring and moving portrayal of a young womans education in a land of men.

In the land of men: a memoir — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "In the land of men: a memoir" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Contents

Guide

For Joe

Contents

I n my office at Esquire was a hand-me-down frame, bequeathed from fiction editors of the past. It was made of chrome, complicatedly beat up, and held a piece the magazine had run in the eighties called Whos Who in the Cosmos 1987. When I started my job as the magazines literary and fiction editor, I found this frame lying on the floor underneath my desk.

The Whos Who, published in the August 1987 summer fiction issue, was part of a special section that month called The Literary Universe. It was one of those exercises in classification and pigeonholing that magazines have done since the beginning of time, a power chart of the eras so-called literary establishment. Cover stars from this issue: John Updike and William Styron. The Whos Who map, which looked kind of like a kids outer space place mat, was a three-page gatefold with hundreds of floating, context-free names of various writers, editors, agents, critics, teachers, and publishers grouped in categories such as Rising Stars, Falling Stars, Out of Orbit, The Parallel Universe, and Lost in Space. You get the drift. Or maybe you dont. Probably you shouldnt. With all due respect to the legendary Esquire fiction editor L. Rust Hills, who compiled the thing as a sort of reprise to a literary power chart the magazine published in 1963, I could never make heads or tails of it. I can guarantee that few Esquire readers of the eighties could, either.

One thing was clear: the place to be on the chart was The Red-Hot Center. As Rust had written in his introduction, the persons located there were generating enormous amounts of heat. The fiction writers placed within that particular red-hot sun (they are all dead now, the sun a graveyard) were Saul Bellow, John Updike, Raymond Carver, Elmore Leonard, and Norman Mailer. Toni Morrison, probably the most important living American novelist, was relegated to a moon in deep space, mentioned only in a roundup of her agencys clients. The red-hot center did contain the names of three women, but none of them were novelists and only one was a writera book critic; the other two were a literary agent and a socialite. And they are all still very much alive, these three, but thats no real surprise. The women always do seem to persevere in the end.

I never knew what to do with the frame. I loathed the literary star system and everything this chart represented, and there was no way I was ever going to hang it on my wall. But I could never quite bring myself to toss it, either. I tried to give it away, but I never found any takers, not even among the more seasoned Esquire veterans (meaning: Rust Hills, who never seemed to want to take credit for his own creation). So, during the years I had that office, the framed Whos Who existed in a kind of purgatory, lying faceup on the bottom shelf of a bookcase behind my desk, with books and submissions and whatnot stacked on top of it.

When I started the job in 1997, no single media outlet could presume the Literary Universewide authority Esquire had attempted to claim for itself a decade before. Was there anything vaguely resembling a red-hot center or even a general literary universe anymore? And if there was, was I now somehow, at age twenty-five, as Esquires literary editor, an improbable gatekeeper to it? (Or warden? Den mother, maybe?)

At the bottom of the page was a large catchall category called On the Horizon, and included in it was a twenty-five-year-old novelist named David Foster Wallace, who had just published his first book. Eleven years after his Literary Universe cameo, David was in my office, sitting in the squat red velvet swivel chair across from my desk, with the frame in his lap.

God, I hate this thing, he said.

Davids hair was cut short underneath his blue bandanna, his complexion was turbulent, and he had, as my grandmother liked to say about any white person whod been in the sun, good color. I considered him for a moment.

Youre looking very tan right now, David.

The brown-gold Wallace eyes gleamed deviously. I would edit four short stories of Davids for Esquire. He was the fiction writer with whom Id work the most frequently at the magazine.

Well, I am half quadroon, he said.

David was using my purple-and-white plastic TRUMP TAJ MAHAL cupwhich Id acquired two years before on an ill-advised trip to Atlantic City and had brought to the office for reasons unknownas his tobacco cuspidor. Patiently, he waited for me to figure out what a half quadroon was.

Octoroon, I said finally.

Touch, he replied.

I had been amazed, and not in an entirely good way, how David was able to recollect so many details about the Literary Universe chartwho was situated where; the names, for example, of the writers placed in the Falling Stars category, and the distinction between the Rising Stars grouping and Davids own On the Horizon. (The Rising Stars category had Julian Barnes, Richard Ford, and Louise Erdrich in it and was the far better place to be.) The truth was that I hadnt known much at all about the notorious history of the Literary Universe, which had been seemingly scrubbed from the Esquire institutional memory, or anything about what a toxic plum cake it had been in literary circles, before David told me about it. According to David, writers and editors had spent the summer of 1987 nattering away about the Literary Universeeveryone joined in the belief that the thing was shallow, cynical, and ridiculous... yet everyone knew exactly where, or if, he was placed on it. The most Id ever heard, or would ever hear, from anyone about the Literary Universe was from David.

How old were you when it came out? he asked.

I did a quick calculation. Fifteen. Ninth grade.

Jesus, he said.

Hed had a residency at a writers colony in upstate New York when the issue was published and began describing how he had taken his august inclusion in the chart as an excuse to behave as badly as possible at the colony, and everywhere else.

But do you know whats most depressing of all? he asked. How much I actually cared about this thing. All I could think was When do I get to the red-hot center?

The dark little laugh.

I suppose if there was a red-hot center in the late nineties/early aughts, that center might as well have been David. There was a sense that David, more than any other living writer, was read competitively, his sui generisness unbearable to all. It was dangerous, having David around in the world then. Before he could be turned into something else entirelyfirst, a beloved tragic personage; then, a cultural hero; later, a cautionary tale; finally, a monsterhe would need to be safely, tactfully dead. Blood is required of our heroesand monsters.

Why would you even care what some magazine says? I asked.

David looked over at me, eyes bright behind his glasses.

The good thing about you, he said, is that you would never do anything like this.

Obviously not, I sensibly replied.

He started fanning his T-shirt. Is it exceptionally hot in here or is it just me? he asked.

The visit to my office had been Davids idea (I cant detach from you just yet), though he was being very weird about it: he didnt want anyone to see him, so we kept the door closed.

I asked him if he wanted me to open the door to let in some air.

Eh, David said. Id be too self-conscious to talk to you if the door were open.

He discreetly expectorated into my TRUMP TAJ MAHAL cup and went into a quick story about a photo shoot for Us magazine (seriously, Us magazine?) hed agreed to do with several other young writers in the eighties. By his account, the shoot had not gone well. Indeed, it had gone the opposite of well.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «In the land of men: a memoir»

Look at similar books to In the land of men: a memoir. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «In the land of men: a memoir»

Discussion, reviews of the book In the land of men: a memoir and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.