John Frank - The Cancer Killing Diet

The Cancer Killing Diet

By J. J. Frank

Copyright 2014 J. J. Frank

Smashwords Edition

Preface

As cancer grows inside of us it consumes morethan its fair share of the carbohydrates. To counter this, cancerpatients should eat fats and protein to sustain normal cells and tokeep their organs functioning while battling cancer. Basically,cancer cells will put our normal cells on a low carb diet. Firstour normal cells will burn fat. When the fat runs out the normalcells will resort to burning protein to sustain them. When thenormal cells use the protein they reduce the amount of amino acidyour organs need to function. When that happens, your organs shutdown.

The Cancer Killing Diet

Will this diet kill cancer cells?

Yes.

Is it safe?

No!

In fact if used inappropriately it could killyou!

But the principles behind this diet could beused to help defeat cancer.

So let's first look at the diet.

It's not loaded with antioxidants.

Nor is it's a low carb diet.

It's a no carb diet!

Yes, a no carb diet!

I am suggesting a diet consisting only of fatand protein. Eggs, bacon (plain not maple or sugar cured), butter,pork, beef, foul and fish. Along with that you should take somesupplements. I would think that of a one a day multiple vitaminand mineral pill with every meal. Plus some fish oil pills and somevitamin D3, both twice a day. Lets not get too concerned about thesupplements. The diet is only meant to be used for a short periodof time.

So how does this diet kill cancercells?

Simple, it will starve them todeath.

We say cancer loves sugar but actually cancercells need glucose to live.

Cancer cells ferment their food source insteadof oxidizing it.

Of the three food groups; protein, fat andcarbs, carbs are the only ones cancers cells can ferment, whilenormal cells can oxidize all three.

Eliminating the carbs from your diet will killthe cancer cells within days.

So what's the problem?

This diet seems similar to that of the Eskimoswho lived off of whale fat and meat for hundreds ofyears.

Well, there are three problems.

The first problem is it will drop your bloodsugar levels. For those who are diabetic this could cause adiabetic low carb coma.

The second problem is, when the diet kills thecancer cells, your body will now have to remove millions of deadcancer cells.

This task may be overwhelming.

Similar to chemo this will make you sick. Itwill play havoc on your body, weaken your immune system andpossibly cause liver failure.

The third problem is your body removes diedcells by an inflammatory process.

Just like a head or arm injury that swells up,the cancer tumors will also swell.

Its the swelling that becomes aproblem.

Depending on the location of the tumor thiscould be serious.

Bone cancer and brain tumors are confined andthe swelling can become painful.

Cancer tumors near an artery or nerve will alsobe a problem.

The swelling in these types of locations cancause anything from pain to paralysis or death.

So what is the theory behind this diet thatsgoing to help us defeat cancer?

As I looked at cancer and cancer treatments Ikept wondering why and how cancer cells kill us. Cancer cells arethe weakest cells.

When we subject our bodies to chemo they arethe first to die.

They are basic, elementary cells.

All they do is eat and replicate.

Then I realized that the cancer cells dontkill us!

They force our normal cells to do the dirtywork!

By eating all the glucose the cancer cellsforce our normal cells to burn fat to sustain themselves. Just likea bear hibernating or a low-carb diet.

When the normal cells run out of fat they willutilize protein to sustain themselves.

Protein provides the amino acids which areessential to most of our bodys functions.

When our normal cells start utilizing theprotein they remove the amino acids from our system and our organsshut down.

Just before a cancer patients organs shutdown, they lose weight.

Then their organs shut down and this happenswithin a few days.

This is much too short to be caused bystarvation.

Its the lack of the amino acids that causestheir organs to shut down.

So, if I had late stage cancer, what would I dowith this information?

First I would include large portions of fat andprotein in my diet.

If my theory is correct, this should buy memore time to fight the cancer.

Then I would have my oncologists team safelyremove the tumors.

I would prefer minimally invasivesurgery.

I dont believe we need to get all of thecancer.

I believe we only need to get the bulk of thecancer.

I would also utilize IPTLD (insulinpotentiation therapy low dose) instead of todays standard chemo. Ibelieve the less damage and poison you subject your body to, thebetter off you will be.

So, will this diet cure cancer?

No.

Our bodies produce thousands of cancer cellsevery day.

So the word cure is not appropriate. Defeatwould be a better term.

Normally our immune system destroys the cancercells and keeps cancer at bay.

When our bodies produce more cancer cells thanour immune system can handle, cancer tumors develop. By utilizingthis diet for short periods of time, on a scheduled cycle, itshould help our immune system defeat cancer.

Warning! Warning! Warning!

Do not do this diet at home.

Arbitrarily killing cancer cells could befatal!

Let your oncologist determine the location andextent of the cancer.

Let your oncologist safely remove thecancer.

Then discuss using the principles of this dietto help your immune system keep cancer at bay.

Also look at life style changes. If you dontmake any changes, why wouldnt the cancer come back? After all, ifyou keep doing what youve always done, youll keep getting whatyou always got. And you got cancer!

Insulin Potentiation Therapy LowDose

Some of you may not be familiar with insulinpotentiation therapy low dose. In 2013 I wrote an essay titledFinally, a better form of Chemotherapy, I.P.T.L.D. At this timeyou can get a free copy of that at Barnes & Noble and atSmashword.com. I had read some articles critical of I.P.T.L.D. andlast month I had written a rebuttal. I have decided to include therebuttal in this essay.

Several organizations and individuals havewritten articles that criticize IPTLD. The two main issues thatthey center on are there have never been any studies done and thatthe treatment drops the patient's blood sugar to dangerously lowlevels.

The same organizations and individuals,although they talk with authority about IPTLD, have also never doneany studies on IPTLD. In fact the articles I have seen have beenwritten by people who have never treated a cancer patient anddefinitely have never used IPTLD. If you read their articlescarefully you will notice that they also avoid saying it doesntwork. They just continue to point to the fact that no studies havebeen done. But, the oncologists, who use IPTLD, had studied it,thought it would be beneficial to their patients, spent their owntime and money to be trained to administer IPT LD. Remember it hasnot been taught in any University or medical school. They had totake time off from their practice, travel across the country to betrained at an oncologist convention or Dr. Garcias clinic inMexico. You dont do that on a whim. And, after using it, theyspeak highly of it. If I have an electrical problem in my housewhich I cannot fix, I will seek out an electrician, not a plumber.If I develop cancer I will seek out an oncologist and it will beone that utilizes IPTLD.

As far as low blood sugar levels go, these sameorganizations and individuals condone the use of a PET scan tolocate cancer tumors. The two treatments are similar, both have thepatients blood sugar dropped to the appropriate level and then aregiven glucose, tainted with radiation for the PET scan or chemo forthe IPTLD. The main difference is with the use of insulin. TheIPTLD patient is in a state of low blood sugar levels for a shorterperiod of time and those having a PET scan done. I believe that inthe future, PET scan technology will include insulin to reduce thetime patients are in this low sugar levels.