• Complain

Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory

Here you can read online Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board - 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: National Academies Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory

2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The charge of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board (ARLTAB) is to provide biannual assessments of the scientific and technical quality of the research, development, and analysis programs at the Army Research Laboratory (ARL). The advice provided in this report focuses on technical rather than programmatic considerations. The Board is assisted by six National Research Council (NRC) panels, each of which focuses on the portion of the ARL program conducted by one of ARLs six directorates. When requested to do so by ARL, the Board also examines work that cuts across the directorates. The Board has been performing assessments of ARL since 1996. The current report summarizes its finding for the 2009-2010 period, during which 96 volunteer experts in fields of science and engineering participated in the following activities: visiting ARL annually, receiving formal presentations of technical work, examining facilities, engaging in technical discussions with ARL staff, and reviewing ARL technical materials. The Board continues to be impressed by the overall quality of ARLs technical staff and their work and applauds ARL for its clear, passionate concern for the end user of its technology--the soldier in the field--and for ARLs demonstrated mindfulness of the importance of transitioning technology to support immediate and longer-term Army needs. ARL staff also continue to expand their involvement with the wider scientific and engineering community. In general, ARL is working very well within an appropriate research and development (R&D) niche and has been demonstrating significant accomplishments.

Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board: author's other books


Who wrote 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Boar d Laboratory Assessments - photo 1Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Boar d Laboratory Assessments - photo 2

Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Boar d Laboratory Assessments Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington DC wwwnapedu THE NATIONAL - photo 3

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C.

www.nap.edu
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the authoring board responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This study was supported by Contract No. DAAD17-03-C-0017 between the National Academy of Sciences and the Army Research Laboratory. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-21140-6 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-21140-9

Cover: Images courtesy of the Army Research Laboratory. Design by Liza Hamilton.

Copies of this report are available from

Laboratory Assessments Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter - photo 4

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academys purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.or g

ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT BOARD

LYLE H. SCHWARTZ, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (retired), Chair DONALD M. CHIARULLI, University of Pittsburgh DAVID E. CROW, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Engine Company (retired) MARJORIE ERICKSON, Phoenix Engineering Associates, Inc. GEORGE T. GRAY III, Los Alamos National Laboratory PETER M. KOGGE, University of Notre Dame JEREMY M. WOLFE, Harvard Medical School

Staff

JAMES P. McGEE, Director ARUL MOZHI, Senior Program Officer LIZA HAMILTON, Administrative Coordinator ROSE NEUGROSCHEL, Research Associate EVA LABRE, Program Associate

v

Acknowledgment of Reviewer s

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Councils Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Deborah A. Boehm-Davis, George Mason University,

George E. Dieter, University of Maryland,

Michael Dunn, Ohio State University,

David Ferguson, Issaquah, Washington,

Douglas H. Harris, Anacapa Sciences, Inc.,

Jimmy K. Omura, San Francisco, California, and

Dwight C. Streit, University of California, Los Angeles.

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Alton D. Slay, Warrenton, Virginia. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring board and the institution.

vii

Contents

SUMMAR Y 1

1 INTRODUCTION 12 The Biennial Assessment Process, 12 Preparation and Organization of This Report, 13 Assessment Criteria, 14 Approach Taken During the Report Preparation, 15 Report Content, 16

2 COMPUTATIONAL AND INFORMATION SCIENCES DIRECTORATE 17 Introduction, 17 Changes Since the Previous Review, 18 Accomplishments and Advancements, 19 Opportunities and Challenges, 22 Overall Technical Quality of the Work, 28

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory»

Look at similar books to 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory»

Discussion, reviews of the book 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.