• Complain

Tao Jiang - Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom

Here you can read online Tao Jiang - Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Oxford University Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Tao Jiang Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom
  • Book:
    Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book rewrites the story of classical Chinese philosophy, which has always been considered the single most creative and vibrant chapter in the history of Chinese philosophy. Works attributed to Confucius, Mozi, Mencius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, Xunzi, Han Feizi and many others represent the very origins of moral and political thinking in China. As testimony to their enduring stature, in recent decades many Chinese intellectuals, and even leading politicians, have turned to those classics, especially Confucian texts, for alternative or complementary sources of moral authority and political legitimacy. Therefore, philosophical inquiries into core normative values embedded in those classical texts are crucial to the ongoing scholarly discussion about China as China turns more culturally inward. It can also contribute to the spirited contemporary debate about the nature of philosophical reasoning, especially in the non-Western traditions.This book offers a new narrative and interpretative framework about the origins of moral-political philosophy that tracks how the three normative values, humaneness, justice, and personal freedom, were formulated, reformulated, and contested by early Chinese philosophers in their effort to negotiate the relationship among three distinct domains, the personal, the familial, and the political. Such efforts took place as those thinkers were reimagining a new moral-political order, debating its guiding norms, and exploring possible sources within the context of an evolving understanding of Heaven and its relationship with the humans. Tao Jiang argues that the competing visions in that debate can be characterized as a contestation between partialist humaneness and impartialist justice as the guiding norm for the newly imagined moral-political order, with the Confucians, the Mohists, the Laoists, and the so-called fajia thinkers being the major participants, constituting the mainstream philosophical project during this period. Thinkers lined up differently along the justice-humaneness spectrum with earlier ones maintaining some continuity between the two normative values (or at least trying to accommodate both to some extent) while later ones leaning more toward their exclusivity in the political/public domain. Zhuangzi and the Zhuangists were the outliers of the mainstream moral-political debate who rejected the very parameter of humaneness versus justice in that discourse. They were a lone voice advocating personal freedom, but the Zhuangist expressions of freedom were self-restricted to the margins of the political world and the interiority of ones heartmind. Such a take can shed new light on how the Zhuangist approach to personal freedom would profoundly impact the development of this idea in pre-modern Chinese political and intellectual history.

Tao Jiang: author's other books


Who wrote Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China
Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China
Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom

TAO JIANG

Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China Contestation of Humaneness Justice and Personal Freedom - image 1

Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China Contestation of Humaneness Justice and Personal Freedom - image 2

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press

198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.

Oxford University Press 2021

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2021913732

ISBN 9780197611364 (pbk.)

ISBN 9780197603475 (hbk.)

ISBN 9780197603499 (epub.)

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197603475.001.0001

To Biyun

Contents

This book was initially conceived of as a project on Zhuangzis philosophy a decade and a half ago. In the course of doing the research and formulating what I believed to be a cogent and compelling Zhuangist project of personal freedom, I felt it necessary to account for the Confucian and the Mohist ideas critiqued and ridiculed by the Zhuangists as a way to frame the Zhuangist project. However, I quickly realized the inadequacy in my understanding of the Confucian and the Mohist projects, which were the mainstream moral-political projects during the Warring States period. Sure, I was familiar with the basic concepts, the standard narratives and interpretative tropes, and various points of disputation, but I only had a vague sense of the philosophical nature of their projects. More specifically, I did not know what guiding values were motivating those thinkers and why those values were important to them. Therefore, it seemed only natural to expand my study to include all the major thinkers of the classical period, which eventually became this monograph over a decade later.

Therefore, this book was driven by a desire to understand the origins of moral-political philosophy in China, especially the nature of major philosophical projects, the intellectual parameters within which they originated and operated, the changing normative boundaries that were, more often than not, crossed and transgressed, as well as the guiding (and evolving) values that motivated early Chinese philosophers to grapple with a radically changing world. It offers a new narrative and interpretative framework about the origins of moral-political philosophy that tracks how the three core values, i.e., humaneness, justice, and personal freedom, were formulated, reformulated, and contested by early Chinese philosophers in their effort to negotiate the relationship among three distinct domains, i.e., the personal, the familial, and the political. Such efforts took place as those thinkers were reimagining a new moral-political order, debating its guiding norms, and exploring possible doctrinal sources within the context of an evolving understanding of Heaven and its relationship with the humans.

Over the years, I have benefited greatly from conversations and discussions on many aspects of the project with friends and colleagues at conferences, workshops, guest lectures, and dinner tables, as well as through private correspondences. I would like to especially acknowledge my indebtedness to Philip J. Ivanhoe, who read an early draft of the manuscript and offered many invaluable comments that were very helpful in improving the book. I also want to thank the following friends and colleagues who helped me at different phases of the project: On-cho Ng, who invited me to present parts of my project at the Penn State Comparative Literature luncheon and who has continuously encouraged me and expressed confidence in my project over the years; Masayuki Sato , who shared with me his works on Xunzi; and Zheng Jiewen , who helped me to gain access to his works on Mozi. I am grateful to colleagues at Peking University (Beijing), Fudan University (Shanghai), Jilin University (Changchun), and National Taiwan University (Taipei) for their kind invitations to present materials that have been incorporated into this book.

At Rutgers University I have been very fortunate to have supportive friends and colleagues in the departments of Religion, Philosophy, and Asian Languages and Cultures, as well as at the Center for Chinese Studies. They have provided a collegial environment for my professional life. I want to express my gratitude to James Turner Johnson of the Religion Department for his sagely advice over the years, especially when I first became department chair in 2010. Emma Wasserman and I have been kindred spirits since she came to Rutgers in 2008. I especially enjoyed our many meetups at the Think Coffee in Chelsea, NYC, during our sabbatical several years ago to update each other on the progress of our own projects. My friendship with Wendy Swartz in the Department of Asian Languages and Cultures has lasted longer than our respective affiliations with Rutgers. I have learned a great deal from the Chinese Medieval Studies Workshop she has been hosting over the years. Larry Temkin of the Philosophy Department offered detailed comments on an earlier draft of my paper on Zhuangzi and Berlin, which is incorporated into the conclusion of this book. Ruth Chang (now at Oxford) and Dean Zimmerman of the Philosophy Department have been great partners in the effort to bring Chinese philosophy to Rutgers through the Rutgers Workshop on Chinese Philosophy (RWCP) we started together in 2012. Stephen Angle of Wesleyan University has been an indispensable part of the RWCP initiative from the very beginning. Other friends and colleagues at Rutgers, including Edwin Bryant, Jessey Choo, Xian Huang, Tia Kolbaba, Sukhee Lee, Mingwei Liu, Xun Liu, James Masschaele, Jawid Mojaddedi, Nancy Rosario, Susan Rosario, Tanja Sargent, Richard VanNess Simmons, Weijie Song, Louisa Schein, Xiaojue Wang, Joseph Williams, and many others have all made my professional life at Rutgers a deeply fulfilling one.

I want to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their hard work in making this book a better final product. It would be an unforgivable omission if I did not mention the extraordinary vigor and care demonstrated by reviewer #2. The detailed and thorough, chapter-by-chapter, nine-page single-spaced comment on the manuscript goes far beyond what is normally expected for an anonymous review. It is vigorous, critical, and fairreally the best kind of review an author can receive.

A special thanks goes to Lucy Randall, my editor at Oxford University Press, whose empathy, reassurance, and understanding in guiding me through this entire process was simply exemplary. Hannah Doyle at Oxford University Press was also very helpful in shepherding the book through its final stages. I am grateful to Sara Ellenbogen, who proofread an earlier version of the manuscript.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom»

Look at similar books to Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom»

Discussion, reviews of the book Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.