• Complain

Stephen Jay Gould - Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History

Here you can read online Stephen Jay Gould - Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1977, 1992, publisher: W. W. Norton, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Stephen Jay Gould Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History
  • Book:
    Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    W. W. Norton
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1977, 1992
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

More than any other modern scientists, Stephen Jay Gould has opened up to millions the wonders of evolutionary biology. His genius as an essayist lies in his unmatched ability to use his knowledge of the world, including popular culture, to illuminate the realm of science.Ever Since Darwin, Stephen Jay Goulds first book, has sold more than a quarter of a million copies. Like all succeeding collections by this unique writer, it brings the art of the scientific essay to unparalleled heights.***A nice complement to the first part, is the 5-segment series Darwiniana posted by TimeWizud in 2009 on YouTube. From the authors description:This is a lecture made by Stephen Jay Gould at Wittenburg University. I simply took his voice and added pictures and video. I do not own ANY of it!The lecture was derived from Part I of Goulds book, Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. Part 1 of the book is called Darwiniana and is composed of four chapters: Ch 1 Darwins Delay, Ch 2 Darwins Sea Charge, or Five Years at the Captains Table, Ch 3 Darwins Dilemma: The Odyssey of Evolution, and Ch 4 Darwins Untimely Burial.Ive split the video into a few parts, each a little under ten minutes. After watching them, I hope you see how Gould incorporated each chapter of Darwiniana into the lecture. They revolve around Darwin and the birth of what Gould calls one of the greatest half-dozen scientific ideas of all time. He tackles fundamental questions and asks them in the form of riddles. The lecture was titled Darwins Revolution in Thought, because Darwins ideas were radical and difficult for people to digest.

Stephen Jay Gould: author's other books


Who wrote Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Ever Since Darwin
Reflections in Natural History
Ever Since Darwin
Reflections in Natural History
Stephen Jay Gould

Ever Since Darwin Reflections in Natural History - image 1

W. W. NORTON & COMPANY. NEWYORK.LONDON

FOR MY FATHER

Who took me to see the
Tyrannosaurus when I was five

Contents

ONE HUNDRED YEARS without Darwin are enough, grumbled the noted American geneticist H.J. Muller in 1959. The remark struck many listeners as a singularly inauspicious way to greet the centenary of the Origin of Species, but no one could deny the truth expressed in its frustration.

Why has Darwin been so hard to grasp? Within a decade, he convinced the thinking world that evolution had occurred, but his own theory of natural selection never achieved much popularity during his lifetime. It did not prevail until the 1940s, and even today, though it forms the core of our evolutionary theory, it is widely misunderstood, misquoted, and misapplied. The difficulty cannot lie in complexity of logical structure, for the basis of natural selection is simplicity itselftwo undeniable facts and an inescapable conclusion:

1.Organisms vary, and these variations are inherited (at least in part) by their offspring.

2.Organisms produce more offspring than can possibly survive.

3.On average, offspring that vary most strongly in directions favored by the environment will survive and propagate. Favorable variation will therefore accumulate in populations by natural selection.

These three statements do ensure that natural selection will operate, but they do not (by themselves) guarantee for it the fundamental role that Darwin assigned. The essence of Darwins theory lies in his contention that natural selection is the creative force of evolutionnot just the executioner of the unfit. Natural selection must construct the fit as well; it must build adaptation in stages by preserving, generation after generation, the favorable part of a random spectrum of variation. If natural selection is creative, then our first statement on variation must be amplified by two additional constraints.

First, variation must be random, or at least not preferentially inclined toward adaptation. For, if variation comes prepackaged in the right direction, then selection plays no creative role, but merely eliminates the unlucky individuals who do not vary in the appropriate way. Lamarckism, with its insistence that animals respond creatively to their needs and pass acquired traits to offspring, is a non-Darwinian theory on this account. Our understanding of genetic mutation suggests that Darwin was right in maintaining that variation is not predirected in favorable ways. Evolution is a mixture of chance and necessitychance at the level of variation, necessity in the working of selection.

Secondly, variation must be small relative to the extent of evolutionary change in the foundation of new species. For if new species arise all at once, then selection only has to remove former occupants to make way for an improvement that it did not manufacture. Again, our understanding of genetics encourages Darwins view that small mutations are the stuff of evolutionary change.

Thus, Darwins apparently simple theory is not without its subtle complexities and additional requirements. Nonetheless, I believe that the stumbling block to its acceptance does not lie in any scientific difficulty, but rather in the radical philosophical content of Darwins messagein its challenge to a set of entrenched Western attitudes that we are not yet ready to abandon. First, Darwin argues that evolution has no purpose. Individuals struggle to increase the representation of their genes in future generations, and that is all. If the world displays any harmony and order, it arises only as an incidental result of individuals seeking their own advantagethe economy of Adam Smith transferred to nature. Second, Darwin maintained that evolution has no direction; it does not lead inevitably to higher things. Organisms become better adapted to their local environments, and that is all. The degeneracy of a parasite is as perfect as the gait of a gazelle. Third, Darwin applied a consistent philosophy of materialism to his interpretation of nature. Matter is the ground of all existence; mind, spirit, and God as well, are just words that express the wondrous results of neuronal complexity. Thomas Hardy, speaking for nature, expressed his distress at the claim that purpose, direction, and spirit had been banished:

When I took forth at dawning, pool,
Field, flock, and lonely tree,
All seem to gaze at me
Like chastened children sitting silent in a school;

Upon them stirs in lippings mere
(As if once clear in call,
But now scarce breathed at all)
We wonder, ever wonder, why we find us here!

Yes, the world has been different ever since Darwin. But no less exciting, instructing, or uplifting; for if we cannot find purpose in nature, we will have to define it for ourselves. Darwin was not a moral dolt; he just didnt care to fob off upon nature all the deep prejudices of Western thought. Indeed, I suggest that the true Darwinian spirit might salvage our depleted world by denying a favorite theme of Western arrogancethat we are meant to have control and dominion over the earth and its life because we are the loftiest product of a preordained process.

In any case, we must come to terms with Darwin. And to do this, we must understand both his beliefs and their implications. All the disparate essays of this book are devoted to the exploration of this view of lifeDarwins own term for his new evolutionary world.

These essays, written from 197477, originally appeared in my monthly column for Natural History Magazine, entitled This View of Life. They range broadly from planetary and geological to social and political history, but they are united (in my mind at least) by the common thread of evolutionary theoryDarwins version. I am a tradesman, not a polymath; what I know of planets and politics lies at their intersection with biological evolution.

I am not unmindful of the journalists quip that yesterdays paper wraps todays garbage. I am also not unmindful of the outrages visited upon our forests to publish redundant and incoherent collections of essays; for, like Dr. Seuss Lorax, I like to think that I speak for the trees. Beyond vanity, my only excuses for a collection of these essays lie in the observation that many people like (and as many people despise) them, and that they seem to cohere about a common themeDarwins evolutionary perspective as an antidote to our cosmic arrogance.

The first section explores Darwins theory itself, especially the radical philosophy that inspired H.J. Mullers complaint. Evolution is purposeless, nonprogressive, and materialistic. I approach the heavy message through some entertaining riddles: who was the Beagles naturalist (not Darwin); why didnt Darwin use the word evolution; and why did he wait twenty-one years to publish his theory?

The application of Darwinism to human evolution forms the second section. I try to stress both our uniqueness and our unity with other creatures. Our uniqueness arises from the operation of ordinary evolutionary processes, not from any predisposition toward higher things.

In the third section, I explore some complex issues in evolutionary theory through their application to peculiar organisms. On one level, these essays are about deer with giant antlers, flies that eat their mother from inside, clams that evolve a decoy fish on their rear end, and bamboos that only flower every 120 years. On another level, they treat the issues of adaptation, perfection, and apparent senselessness.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History»

Look at similar books to Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History»

Discussion, reviews of the book Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.